Monday, 30 May 2016

Week 26 – APC – Professional Context



School climate:
The school I am teaching at feels to me as though it has a very positive climate. The strong relationship between staff and students was the first thing I observed when I joined the school community this year. The number of students that stopped to say hello and ask how I was going surprised me. The staff and students have a strong motivation to achieve whether it is in sporting, music or cultural endeavours and there is an expectation that students and staff will work together towards these goals. There is a shared vision. This allows the students a greater range of freedom than I have observed at other schools I have taught at. They are trusted by staff to carry out work independently or in groups within or outside of the classroom environment, they seem motivated to learn and succeed and do so in a way that is both responsible and productive. This is reflected in the physical environment of the school which has changed to incorporate break out spaces, modern classrooms that are much more flexible in design with movable desks, doors that slide open to allow for greater freedom and independence in where and how the students learn.

School culture:
The culture of the school is underpinned by some long held traditions, regular chapel services, clan competitions and activities like generations day reinforce the history of the school and the student’s sense of belonging. Community service and wellbeing programmes reinforce a sense of social responsibility in the wider community and all students have a Personal Development Plan that is made in conjunction with their tutor and families aimed at ensuring that each child has a balance between academic, sporting, cultural and social aspects of their life. The school continues to move forward and acknowledges its diversity and the greater sense of connectedness with the world that our children have with core subjects like Global Living. Which incorporates and acknowledges the greater sense of global responsibility, communication and collaboration that our children may need in the future. 

The values of Respect, Aroha, Endeavour and Enthusiasm, Generosity of Spirit and Integrity are the core values that underpin the school culture. These are unpacked with the staff during staff meetings and form the basis of many of the initiatives around the school (Love week, Clan competitions, Community Service initiatives etc) and are explicitly taught and referred to within the school culture. A holistic view of wellbeing is emphasised and this includes both mental and spiritual wellbeing. My tutor group is currently learning to knit as part of our Wellbeing programme and have decided to knit small hats for premature babies to donate to the hospital as an active way of demonstrating ‘Generosity of Spirit’. As a tutor teacher I am responsible for ensuring that my students develop the skills necessary for wellbeing. The skills identified by Seligman are summarised in the image below:

And the students are taught strategies that support these skills many of which use Carol Dweck’s concept of a growth mindset (2008), for example:


How would you contribute to fostering a positive professional environment in your community of practice?

All teachers have a Performance Develop Plan in which staff set goals for the year, consider their progress against the Professional Teachers Criteria and outline their teaching inquiry. These are shared with teaching colleagues and my faculty and senior management. I have organised with a colleague to have my classroom teaching observed and in return will observe his teaching practice so that we can share ideas and support each other as we carry out an inquiry into teaching practice. Making the time to carry this out and to value and respect each other’s professional learning always seems to be the biggest challenge. It is easy to get caught up in lesson planning and unit plans and put your own professional learning needs and the needs of your colleagues further down the list with the immediacy of the next group of students arriving for class. 

As a department we share resources, reflect on schemes of work and divvy up class trips, marking and other duties. Supporting each other to complete tasks spreads the load, taking the time to dissect lessons, act as a sounding board for ideas, contribute to or facilitate ICE time, department meetings, and staff meetings reinforces that everyone is responsibility for reaching the school goals. 

What changes are occurring in the context of your profession? How would your community of practices address them?

In the 1800s a monk named Gregor Mendel began investigating genetics by counting peas in the abbey garden. He carried out this research on his own. The electron was discovered by J.J Thomson in a lab that contained little more than basic wiring and a vacuum. Today scientists use a 27 kilometre long tunnel and billions of dollars of machinery to search for particles like the searching for new particles like the Higgs boson using a supercollider. The data collected is analysed by a super computer and teams of scientists from across the world. Scientists still investigate the natural world around them but how that collect that data, collaborate and peer review work has changed. The internet allows for more collaboration, greater replication as experimental designs are easily published, replicated and improved upon. There is greater opportunity for peer review and the advancements in technology mean that the scale of data that can be collect is often huge.
The New Zealand Curriculum is trying to address these issues through the Nature of Science strand and the scientific capabilities.

I believe the 21st century skills of collaboration, communication, creativity and critical thinking underpin these (Partnership for 21st Learning, n.d).
Bull suggested that the key drivers for school science programmes should be nurturing curiosity, encouraging questions, and developing a respect for evidence (2015, p.1). With my junior classes I am try to expose them as much as possible to real scientific research looking at different aspects of scientific research that support the key competencies through programmes like Waterwatch, Engineers Without Borders and digital communities like Zooniverse.

Zooniverse  Example: htps://daily.zooniverse.org/ 

This is a citizen science project where volunteers help scientists and researchers deal with the flood of data that confronts them. In the sea floor activity. Students look through images of the North Atlantic seabed and classify the creatures the find. This related to my content (classification), key competencies (participating and contributing), and science capabilities (gathering data etc). It creates good discussion around data collection and how it is analysed, used digital technology and allows students to be involved in something real.

It is a challenge to find activities that support and integrate the key competencies, nature of science, science capabilities and are ‘real’. I often which that as a community of science teachers that we work together more to collaborate across schools both on the student level and as teachers.

Questions:
What sort of activities do your students engage in to support learning in an ever changing environment?
What skills and attitudes do you think are most important for your students?

References
Dweck, C.S. (2008) Mindset: The Psychology of Success. New York: Random House

Partnership for 21st Learning. (n.d). ‘Preparing Students for a Global Society’ An Educators guide to the “Four C”s.  Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf

Bull, A. capabilities for living and lifelong learning: What’s science got to do with it? New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Wellington

Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. William Heinamann. Sydney. ISBN 978186412971


Friday, 27 May 2016

Week 25: Communities of Practice



I have put a lot of thought into this week’s homework as having moved to a new school I am only just becoming familiar with the new community of practice that I find myself in. Please see my previous post ‘Who am I?’ for an overview of my domain, community and practice as defined by Wenger, McDermott & Snyder (2002). Over the past few days I have been considering the professional communities that I interact with that support my teaching practice and allow me to “develop a shared repertoire of resources” (Wenger et al., 2002). See the diagram below. The amount of time and effort that I put into these areas varies as I try to balance my teaching load with family responsibilities and the Mind Lab course. The online interaction has been the most challenging aspect of this course as I often only get to it after all my marking and lesson planning is done and my children are tucked up in bed. It is the thing that I can most easily ‘drop’ but at the same time these posts and discussions are forcing me to take the time to reflect on my practice.

1.      What is the purpose and function of your practice? In what ways do you contribute to the community of your practice?

As a teacher of science from Y9 –Y11 and senior chemistry. I feel it is my responsibility to nurture and develop students’ curiosity about the world around them and help them to engage with that world as much as possible. Through the Nature of Science Strand I try to teach my students about how scientists explore scientific ideas, carry out investigations, communicate, evaluate and participate in the community (Bull, Joyce, Spiller, Hipkins, 2010). I also try to support my colleagues both within my school community and in the cluster groups that I attend by sharing resources, ideas and moderating assessment tasks.
In the diagram above I outlined some of my communities of practice. Three are three main areas that I am currently contributing to my professional community.

Within my school:
Within my school I work collaboratively with the teaching staff in my faculty, reflecting on schemes of work, creating lesson plans, using assessment and student voice to adjust schemes of work, moderating assessment and discussing professional development initiatives. There are also opportunities discussion and collaboration across faculties and as staff as a whole with professional develop sessions and ICE time. More and more as my own teaching practice shifts from ‘sage on the stage’ to ‘guide on the side’ (King, 1993) I have come to find that my students often over the most value insights and feedback into my teaching practice. As a result of this I am becoming interested in different ways of effectively collecting student voice and the validity of using student voice to inform your teaching practice.

Beyond my school:
There are two main initiatives beyond the school gates that I am involved with the Science Teachers cluster and Mindlab:

TAI Science Cluster
The Teaching as Inquiry Cluster group that I am involved with. Run with the support of UC Plus Education this has given me a new community of science teachers to interact with and learn from, from a range of diverse schools. This groups’ focus is on ensuring our priority learners are ‘confident, connected, actively involved lifelong learners’ (Ministry of Education, 2007, p.8) and we collaborate and share our learning as we carry out an inquiry into our teaching practice at our respective schools.

Mind Lab
The Mindlab postgraduate programme has also extended my community of practice. I have thoroughly enjoy the hands on nature of the course and meeting like-minded teachers who are ready for a challenge and to try something new in their classes.  I have found the last assignment that had a focus on contributing to the google plus community has provided that final push I needed to take the first steps towards regularly contributing to an online community. While I belong to a number of communities in which I shared resources I haven’t joined in discussions or debate. Part of me still wonders were people find the time to balance family commitments, school and all its co-curricular activities and study and online communities. However, several of the posts in the RCP community have given me a different point of view or perceptive and caused me to re-think and reflect on prior learning which is invaluable. In replying I have had to clarify my thoughts and take a position on point of view. Wenger’s definition of social learning is “an interplay between social competence and personal experience’ (2000, p.227). I feel the google plus community is a good example of this.

2.      What is your specialist area of practice? How does your specialist area of practice relate to the broader professional context?

My specialist area of practice is Science and senior Chemistry. I am passionate about science education and the opportunities to share and collaborate with students’ and colleagues to inspire curiosity about the world we live in. Dweck (2008) wrote “In a growth mindset, people believe that their most basic abilities can be developed through dedication and hard work—This view creates a love of learning and a resilience that is essential for great accomplishment.” This concept supports my own endeavours to continue to develop in my professional practice.  My students are also taught some of Dweck’s strategies for developing a growth mindset through our school curriculum. Through Mind Lab I have become particularly interested in the concept of 21st Century skills. I believe that the four C’s (communication, creativity, critical thinking, problem solving and collaboration) developed by the Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2011, p.1) map onto to the Key Competencies from the NZ Curriculum as well as the Science Capabilities. I have been exploring this concept through my studies at Mind Lab how these skills can be best supported with technology.
Through my involvement in my Science Teaching as Inquiry Cluster group I am carrying out an inquiry into my teaching practice.  Our group is using Timperley’s version of the inquiry cycle which is an iterative process involving moving through cycles of inquiry and knowledge building. Timperley’s view of professional learning is that it is an internal process that requires active cognitive, emotional and practical engagement as teachers create professional knowledge in a way that challenges previous assumptions and creates new meanings” (Timperley, 2011a, p. xi).

Timperley Inquiry Cycle (2011)

I am at the ‘focusing inquiry’ stage and am using the Thinking with Evidence Test to assess the students understanding of the Nature of Science Strand and the science capabilities. I hope to combine the idea of blended learning with teaching strategies that support the science capabilities. The students are likely to need to support in the Engage with Science strand. This might be well supported by an environmental so any ideas please share!!!

References
Bull, A,, Joyce, C., Spiller, L., Hipkins, R. (2010). Kick-Starting the Nature of Science. NZCER Press. ISBN 978-1-877398-58-2.

Dweck, C.S. (2008) Mindset: The Psychology of Success. New York: Random House

King, A. (1993). Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching, Vol. 41, 1993 pp30-35

The Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum Document.
Retrieved from: http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum

Partnership for 21st Learning. (n.d). ‘Preparing Students for a Global Society’ An Educators guide to the “Four C”s.  Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf

Timperley, H. (2011b). Realizing the Power of Professional Learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Timperley, H. (2011a). A background paper to inform the development of an Australian professional development framework for teachers and school leaders. Retrieved from: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/background_paper_inform_the_development_of_national_professional_development_framework_for_teachers_and_school_leaders

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems.Organization,7(2), 225-246

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.